If you can identify this tree species correctly and completely, I will reward you with chocolate.
So far it has stumped two fire fighters and a forester. Best guess so far is that it is some sort of fir.
Twitterpated
- RT @AJamesMcCarthy: Here’s my first effort at capturing the “Green Comet”, Comet c/2022 E3 (ZTF). This was a particular challenge due to hu… 1 week ago
- RT @johnkrausphotos: Time lapse: Falcon 9 launches 40 OneWeb satellites to orbit at 11:50 p.m. ET Monday and returns to land at Cape Canave… 2 weeks ago
- RT @planet4589: The 'Bad Lip Reading' account does have its moments. 3 weeks ago
Stellar Websites!
Blogroll
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- August 2017
- July 2017
- January 2016
- August 2015
- June 2015
- February 2015
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
Categories
Eat Logical Sentences 
Not pine. Fir. But they say no fir grows in these parts.
Which “fir”? Your fir is not my fir. Your fir is probably Douglas Fir, which is not a fir; it’s pseudotsuga menzeisii, of course. True firs are abies (balsamea, grandis, etc).
Could be true fir i.e. abies. You never know when you’re going to bump into abies. Need cones. Must see cones. Check out: http://www.geog.ubc.ca/biodiversity/eflora/E-FloraTreesofBritishColumbia.html
Thanks for that link! I just did a quick check on amabilis fir, and it is found in Haida Gwaii. Kaan, are we close? Or maybe just wishful thinking…
The needles on amabilis are blunt. These are sharp. No dice. Any other thoughts?
Tomorrow the question goes to two local foresters so an answer may come from them!
First instinct – I think we had these trees in Northern Vancouver Island, and we called them balsam, but they aren’t actually balsam. There was a code for it that we used in our field books that was Hb (or maybe not, it was a long time ago). I remember a co-worker telling me it’s for amabilis fir. But the needles in your photo look a bit too pointy, and doesn’t have the silvery grey at the bottom. The pointy bits almost makes it look like spruce, but then the needles would be more circular around the branch. The bark is also smoother than what I remember. Then I got curious and started looking at photos of trees online, which didn’t help. I haven’t seen a conifer in months, so they are all starting to look the same. We have an abundance of blue gum, palm, mango, and baobab here at least.
Tree nerding from Malawi,
B-Dawg
Pingback: Another tree | Eat Logical Sentences
In case anyone was still wondering, it is a Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis). It is a bit of an unusual example of it though. The needles are less rigid and less omnidirectional than most of the sitka I saw. The orange & oates of this bark was something I only later saw on very old Sitka when I peeled off flakes of bark.